Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yunseok Jang vs Tomohiro Masabayashi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jang vs Masabayashi analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Yunseok Jang vs Tomohiro Masabayashi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jang 0 - 0 Masabayashi
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jang has won 47.97% of points on their second serve, while Masabayashi has won 50.97%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jang, in recent form, has won 53.06% of their opponent's second serve points, while Masabayashi has won 52.61%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.67% and 34.14% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jang has saved 53.42% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Masabayashi has saved 57.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jang has won 38.24% of matches played (W/L 13/ 21), with Masabayashi winning 51.28% (W/L 20/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 53/ 45), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Masabayashi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 17/ 14), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Jang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 39.39% of matches (W/L 13/ 20), where as Masabayashi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.78% of matches (W/L 19/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jang has played against opponents with an average rank of 175.59 while Masabayashi has played against players with an average rank of 152.38.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jang has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Masabayashi has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jang has converted 42.11% of breakpoint opportunities, and Masabayashi has converted 43.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
876
Rank
755
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
Form
53% (57-50)
Career Total W/L
54% (101-85)
50% (12-12)
YTD W/L
57% (13-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Yunseok Jang vs Tomohiro Masabayashi For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Jang VS Masabayashi
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
Jang VS Masabayashi H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yunseok Jang | Tomohiro Masabayashi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (12/12) | 57% (13/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (27/29) | 55% (28/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (248/256) | 51% (241/234) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 48% (10/11) | 56% (10/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 24 | 44 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.1 |
| DFs Total | 68 | 24 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:13 | 1:21:28 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 190 | 150.48 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (810/1302) | 58% (650/1113) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (482/810) | 66% (426/650) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (236/492) | 51% (236/463) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (56/133) | 43% (52/120) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (549/1344) | 41% (437/1062) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 52% (12/11) | 57% (12/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (12/22) | 55% (12/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (6/8) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (11/9) | 100% (12/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (11/2) | 0% (12/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 23% (13/3) | 9% (11/1) |
Yunseok Jang Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Makoto Ochi
Player
Yunseok Jang
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yunseok Jang
Player
Ryota Tanuma
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yunseok Jang
Player
Jonathan Irwanto
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Yunseok Jang
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
46%
(
21 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sanhui Shin
Player
Yunseok Jang
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yunseok Jang
Player
Kokoro Isomura
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
70 of
115)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
9
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
52 of
115)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(1) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yunseok Jang
Player
Sam Ryan Ziegann
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yunseok Jang
Player
Evan Zhu
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
12
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Yunseok Jang
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
96
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Yunseok Jang
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
52%
(
16 of
31)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
51
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Tomohiro Masabayashi Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Makoto Ochi
Player
Tomohiro Masabayashi
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
106)
94
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jake Delaney
Player
Tomohiro Masabayashi
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomohiro Masabayashi
Player
Jack Cheng
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
59%
(
20 of
34)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
38
Total Points Won
35
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomohiro Masabayashi
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
88%
(
15 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomohiro Masabayashi
Player
James Van Herzeele
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Tomohiro Masabayashi
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
15
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
12)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomohiro Masabayashi
Player
Nam Hoang Ly
57%
(
67 of
117)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
58%
(
29 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
53 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
107
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomohiro Masabayashi
Player
Adil Kalyanpur
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryuki Matsuda
Player
Tomohiro Masabayashi
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomohiro Masabayashi
Player
Tatsuma Ito
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jang Vs Masabayashi Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Jang are available here and Masabayashi photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
